I just finished Measuring and Managing Performance in Organizations by Robert D. Austin.
I don't know if a management book has ever made me more sad. Here is a pretty decent model that describes everything I have ever observed about using measurement in management. It's backed up with references to extensive studies, lots of data, and lots of interviews and conversations.
He explains and formalizes a thought I've long held anecdotally; namely that there are cases where measuring everything and managing by those numbers makes sense, and there are other cases where trying to manage to the numbers can be poisonous for an organization. With his model, he is able to predict the criteria under which measurement might be made work and where it will fail.
Most impressively, he builds a good case for why, in a complicated industry that meets his criteria for where managing by numbers will fail, the difficult is inherent to the activity. It's not just that the person implementing the measurement scheme messed up the organization or measures so it didn't work, it's that the activity fundamentally resists measurement. So all attempts to apply a "full supervision" model to particular types of activities will fail. That's my favorite part of the book.
So now, armed with all of this information, a lot of it common sense and a lot of it gleaned from data, certainly companies must be moving away from the "measure and reward" model for their complicated activities right? The book was written in 1996, it must have taken the world by storm and swept across the business world right?
Sadly no, it's been completely ignored and companies seem ever more hot than ever to roll out measurement based performance schemes where they are at best expensive and ineffective and at worse are a genuine poison to your high performing teams. That's why it's depressing.
He's got a good explanation for why people continue to ignore the obvious flaws in purely measurement based systems as well.
The only thing lacking in this book is more ideas about what to do about it. Which is fine in the setting of the book. But I would love to see a "guerilla guide," with lots of practical advice about helping convince people that capturing and managing by metrics has a series of tradeoffs that must be considered carefully.
I highly recommend this to just about anyone.
I've always considered myself an avid reader. I generally read pretty quick and have a few books in progress at any given time. The other day though, I realized that ever since I started allowing my work to completely monopolize my twice a week train rides, I haven't done much reading.
And certainly just about everything I've read in the past two years is a technical or management book. So I'm use this blog to just document my reading, so that if I forget to make time for reading, or get in a rut of one particular type of book, perhaps I'll have a small record of that to remind me to read more, and branch out.
So I'll be posting some little capsules of the books that I've finished this week (I'll continue to be including some of the management style/theory books that I've been in the middle of for a while and am now finishing).
Then I can actually say "likes to read" and not have to think about the last book I read.
I picked up How Full is Your Bucket because the idea was mentioned in another book I read. It primarily outlines the theory of keeping people filled with good feelings as a key to productivity and happiness.
I'm not sure where this book fits in though; the theory is very self explanatory and guessable nearly via the title. There's a few supporting anecdotes and studies (which are at least clearly referenced in the back) in half of the book, and half is 5 techniques for "bucket filling."
It's a very quick read, so I recommend it, but it's only worth the $19.95 cover price if you can hand it off to a bunch of friends/co-workers to read as well. It never gets too detailed.
Should you fill people's buckets? Absolutely. This book does provide some simple things to remember. It's enlightening to analyze what you say/do and see whether it positively or negatively affects others. I've learned I'm not nearly as good as I want to be at being positive, some reasons why, and that for me was worth the price of admission.
This is Rob Meyer's weblog, a weblog focused on software development and system administration based on 10 years of experience. Want to explore further? You can find out more me or see the rest of my website.
Wondering if I've written on something in particular? Try searching:
You might want to take a look at some of the more requested postings (as judged by incoming traffic):
Want more? Subscribe to this site
or contact me at rob at big dis dot com.
See my writings on: